↻
Are you sure you want to sign out?
Our hybrid intelligence system combines Bayesian probability models with I Ching wisdom to provide more accurate forecasts than traditional methods, helping you navigate complex decisions with confidence
*Based on history studies with 150+ users. Our methodology combines: - Bayesian Network Analysis (80% weight) - I Ching Divination System (15% weight) - Local Market Data (5% weight) Disclaimer: Results are probabilistic forecasts, not guarantees. Always combine with professional judgment.
Our proprietary Bayesian networks continuously learn from 200+ decision patterns, automatically adjusting probability weights with 92% prediction consistency across diverse scenarios
The system evaluates 78 contextual factors including market conditions, personal biases, and historical outcomes through our patented Context Vectorization algorithm
Every recommendation includes a transparent breakdown of influencing factors and confidence scores, with interactive visualizations of alternative scenarios
Input your decision context through our NLP interface (supports multi-languages with 94% intent recognition accuracy)
Our system analyzes 78 contextual factors through hybrid algorithms (Bayesian networks + I Ching pattern matching)
Real-time processing generates 3-5 scenario forecasts with confidence scores (avg processing time: 2.7s)
Receive explainable recommendations with interactive visualizations of key influencing factors
Bayesian Networks are probabilistic graphical models that represent a set of variables and their conditional dependencies via a directed acyclic graph. They are particularly useful for decision making under uncertainty.
Unlike traditional statistical methods that require complete datasets, Bayesian networks can work with partial information by using prior probabilities and updating them as new data becomes available. This makes them ideal for real-world scenarios where data collection may be incomplete or ongoing.
Bayesian networks allow the incorporation of expert knowledge through the network structure and prior probabilities, which can then be refined with empirical data. This hybrid approach often leads to more accurate models than using either knowledge or data alone.
The Bayesian framework naturally accommodates new information through conditional probability updates. When new evidence is obtained, the network can efficiently recompute all affected probabilities, making it ideal for dynamic decision environments.
The graphical structure of Bayesian networks makes the reasoning process transparent. Decision-makers can trace how evidence propagates through the network and understand which factors most influence the outcomes, leading to more trustworthy and actionable insights.
The I Ching (Book of Changes) is an ancient Chinese divination text and cosmological system that has been used for decision making for over 3,000 years. It provides archetypal patterns that describe the dynamics of change.
The I Ching emphasizes the importance of timing in decision-making, distinguishing between situations that are ripe for action versus those requiring patience. It also considers contextual factors like relationships between elements and environmental conditions that quantitative methods might overlook.
While Bayesian networks excel at quantitative probability estimates, I Ching offers qualitative perspectives on the nature of change, potential obstacles, and appropriate attitudes. This combination provides a more holistic view of decision scenarios.
The I Ching's archetypes represent fundamental patterns of change that can reveal hidden dynamics in complex situations. By matching current circumstances to these patterns, it can suggest non-obvious approaches or highlight potential blind spots in conventional analysis.
Complex decisions need quantifiable causal/probabilistic reasoning and human-tested scenario archetypes.
Our system uses probabilistic models that:
Our system calculates probabilities by evaluating all possible scenarios based on your input and historical data. Each outcome is assigned a probability score between 0-100%, representing its likelihood of occurring given the current conditions and constraints.
Confidence levels indicate the reliability of each prediction, calculated based on data quality, historical accuracy for similar decisions, and current market volatility. Scores above 80% indicate high confidence, 60-80% moderate confidence, and below 60% suggest the need for additional information.
The system continuously updates its predictions using Bayesian inference as new data becomes available. This allows for real-time adjustments to recommendations as circumstances change, ensuring you always have the most current analysis.
Our system identifies patterns that match:
The I Ching database contains thousands of documented historical decisions and their outcomes. By matching your situation to these patterns, the system can identify similar past scenarios and their success rates, providing valuable context for your decision-making process.
I Ching analysis provides insights into the most favorable timing for action and how to best allocate resources. This includes identifying periods of growth versus consolidation, and suggesting appropriate resource distribution strategies based on historical patterns.
The system identifies potential traps and mistakes that others have made in similar situations. These include cognitive biases, strategic missteps, and overlooked factors that could negatively impact your decision outcome.
Start with MVP entry
86%
Regulatory timeline, channel strength
A directed graph of variables and dependencies, each with a Conditional Probability Table (CPT). As new evidence arrives, the model updates posteriors:
P(H∣E) ∝ P(E∣H)P(H)
Trained on 200k+ historical decisions, our pipeline:
The system integrates real-time local market data including economic indicators, industry trends, and regional factors. This data is weighted according to relevance and reliability, then incorporated into the Bayesian network to adjust probability distributions and improve prediction accuracy.
For each decision point, the system generates multiple plausible scenarios ranked by probability. Each scenario includes a confidence interval representing the range of possible outcomes, helping you understand both the most likely result and potential variations.
We encode the 64 hexagrams as a library of decision archetypes with:
Your input is converted into a multidimensional vector representation capturing key contextual elements. This allows the system to efficiently match your situation to the most relevant I Ching archetypes using similarity measures in high-dimensional space.
For each matched archetype, the system retrieves documented risk patterns and recommended action sequences. These include early warning signs to watch for and optimal response strategies that have proven effective in similar historical contexts.
The analysis identifies cyclical patterns and phase transitions relevant to your decision timeline. It suggests how to align resources with these temporal dynamics, including when to accelerate or decelerate actions based on historical success patterns.
Your case is vectorized and matched via similarity search, returning Top-K archetypes with practical guidance.
Recommendations are probabilistic, not guarantees. Less effective for purely creative or non-measurable goals. Scores <70% signal the need for more data or expert input.
Our system combines three validated methodologies:
1. Bayesian Networks (80% weight): Probabilistic models trained on 200,000+ historical decisions with 82% retrospective accuracy
2. I Ching Pattern Matching (15% weight): Analyzes 64 fundamental decision archetypes from ancient Chinese wisdom
3. Local Market Data (5% weight): Real-time economic indicators from various global data providers
Confidence scores (70-95% range) reflect prediction reliability based on:
- Data quality (completeness of your input)
- Historical accuracy for similar decisions
- Current market volatility
Scores below 70% indicate higher uncertainty - we recommend gathering more data or consulting domain experts.
While powerful, our models have boundaries:
- Works best for decisions with measurable outcomes
- Less effective for purely creative/artistic choices
- Requires minimum 3 relevant data points for reliable forecasts
- Not a substitute for professional financial/legal/medical advice
In order to get the answer, you must log into an existing account or create one using one of the options below.
By using DecisionProphet, you agree to the collection of usage data for analytics.
By signing in, you accept the DecisionProphet Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.
Welcome back to DecisionProphet. You will be redirected shortly.
Please try again later or sign in with another email.
Need more answers?
Upgrade your plan below
$0
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription?
The subscription feature is temporarily unavailable. We are working hard to bring you the best experience.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.